Protecting America’s Agricultural Land from Foreign Harm Act of 2025
This bill has not become law. Status shown reflects the latest official action.
See what this could mean for your district
Save your district in Account to view district-specific context for this bill.
Bill details
Summary
Introduced in House
Protecting America's Agricultural Land from Foreign Harm Act of 2025 This bill prohibits persons associated with the governments of Iran, North Korea, China, or Russia from purchasing or leasing agricultural land in the United States. Specifically, the President must prohibit any person (individual or entity) owned by, controlled by, or subject to the jurisdiction or direction of these foreign governments from purchasing or leasing (1) public agricultural land that is owned by the United States and administered by a federal department or agency, or (2) private agricultural land that is located in the United States. A person that violates or attempts to violate this prohibition is subject to civil and criminal penalties. This prohibition does not require a person that owns or leases agricultural land as of the date of this bill's enactment to sell that land. Further, the President must prohibit a person associated with these foreign governments and who leases, or who has full or partial ownership of, agricultural land in the United States from participating in Department of Agriculture (USDA) programs. Exceptions are included to allow for participation in USDA programs related to food safety, the health and labor safety of individuals, or certain reporting and disclosure requirements. The bill excludes U.S. citizens or lawful permanent residents from these restrictions. The bill also amends the Agricultural Foreign Investment Disclosure Act of 1978 (AFIDA) to require reporting on security interests and leases. Finally, the Government Accountability Office must submit a report to Congress on AFIDA.
District impact notes
The bill prohibits certain foreign governments from acquiring agricultural land in the United States. • This policy could matter locally by affecting the ownership landscape of agricultural land in the area. • It may also influence local agricultural programs and how they interact with federal regulations. • A possible concern is how the enforcement of this prohibition will be managed and what penalties may be applied for violations. AI-generated from official bill summary and plain-English note; verify with official text.
Related votes
Roll calls that reference this bill in official data.
Primary sources
Official links to verify details. (No interpretation.)
About this data
- OurCongress is non-partisan by design. We do not add political interpretation or advocacy.
- Bill data and official summaries come from GovInfo and Congress.gov. Some bills do not have published summaries yet.
- District impact notes (when shown) are AI-generated from official bill metadata/summaries to improve readability. They are not official government language.
- This page updates automatically via a daily ingestion pipeline.