Built to help voters quickly verify how officials vote — district first, party second. All information is sourced from official public records.
S. 5 · 119th Congress

Laken Riley Act

Enacted

See what this could mean for your district

Save your district in Account to view district-specific context for this bill.

Bill details

Introduced: 1/6/2025
Status: Became Public Law No: 119-1.
Bill ID: 119s5
Latest action: Became Public Law No: 119-1.

Summary

Introduced in Senate

Laken Riley Act This bill requires the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to detain certain non-U.S. nationals ( aliens under federal law) who have been arrested for burglary, theft, larceny, or shoplifting. The bill also authorizes states to sue the federal government for decisions or alleged failures related to immigration enforcement. Under this bill, DHS must detain an individual who (1) is unlawfully present in the United States or did not possess the necessary documents when applying for admission; and (2) has been charged with, arrested for, convicted of, or admits to having committed acts that constitute the essential elements of burglary, theft, larceny, or shoplifting. The bill also authorizes state governments to sue for injunctive relief over certain immigration-related decisions or alleged failures by the federal government if the decision or failure caused the state or its residents harm, including financial harm of more than $100. Specifically, the state government may sue the federal government over a • decision to release a non-U.S. national from custody; • failure to fulfill requirements relating to inspecting individuals seeking admission into the United States, including requirements related to asylum interviews; • failure to fulfill a requirement to stop issuing visas to nationals of a country that unreasonably denies or delays acceptance of nationals of that country; • violation of limitations on immigration parole, such as the requirement that parole be granted only on a case-by-case basis; or • failure to detain an individual who has been ordered removed from the United States.

Source: BILLSUM · Summary date: 1/6/2025

District impact notes

0 notes

No impact notes have been generated for this bill yet.

These impact notes are AI-generated from official bill metadata/summary as a prototype feature — not official government language.

Tip: impacts are typically generated by the scheduled workflow. If you just ran it, refresh in a minute.

Related votes

Roll calls that reference this bill in official data.

4 roll calls
Senate · 119 / 1 · Roll 7
On Passage of the Bill
Date: 1/20/2025Result: Bill Passed
Senate · 119 / 1 · Roll 5
On the Cloture Motion
Date: 1/17/2025Result: Cloture Motion Agreed to
Senate · 119 / 1 · Roll 2
On the Motion to Proceed
Date: 1/13/2025Result: Motion to Proceed Agreed to
Senate · 119 / 1 · Roll 1
On Cloture on the Motion to Proceed
Date: 1/9/2025Result: Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to

Primary sources

Official links to verify details. (No interpretation.)

Summary source label: BILLSUM
About this data
  • OurCongress is non-partisan by design. We do not add political interpretation or advocacy.
  • Bill data and official summaries come from GovInfo and Congress.gov. Some bills do not have published summaries yet.
  • District impact notes (when shown) are AI-generated from official bill metadata/summaries to improve readability. They are not official government language.
  • This page updates automatically via a daily ingestion pipeline.

About this data

Non-partisan by design
OurCongress provides plain-English context without endorsements, political interpretation, or advocacy.
Official sources
Data is sourced from official government records (e.g., Congress.gov, GovInfo, Clerk of the House, and the U.S. Senate).
AI-generated text
Some sections may be AI-generated from official summaries/metadata to help readability. AI output can be imperfect—verify with primary sources.
Last updated: 1/6/2025Source: BILLSUMBill: 119s5Learn more →